Worked at Klingenthal, 1790-1820. One man’s work might often suggest the influence of another without being necessarily an absolute copy. A typical example of this is found in these instruments. They have the Hopf traits, but also one or two divergencies. Blocky outline, middle curves far from elegant, and lower bouts very broad. Sides frequently built too high, making the wrong air space inside. Though built of large proportions and of medium arching, the tone only seems powerful to the performer, and in reality has very little penetrative force. Quite possibly this is due to the probable thinning of belly which, now that the wood is dried and porous, has rendered the tone hollow, although to a certain degree clear. Often widish grain wood for tops, but occasionally fine grain also; and small flamed maple for backs. In workmanship he accomplished nothing out of the ordinary, sometimes even bordering on slovenliness. Soundholes not particularly attractive in stem or curves, geherally small. Rather long and unnaturally posed scroll. Red brown varnish of fair quality but sometimes also thick and without lustre. Notwithstanding the blemishes enumerated, specimens have realised £20 to £30.
Branded “Hopf” on the back.
Worked at Klingenthal, 1790-1820. One man’s work might often suggest the influence of another without being necessarily an absolute copy. A typical example of this is found in these instruments. They have the Hopf traits, but also one or two divergencies. Blocky outline, middle curves far from elegant, and lower bouts very broad. Sides frequently built too high, making the wrong air space inside. Though built of large proportions and of medium ar...
Hopf,David (1) (Dafid)
